What Candidates Hate: 10 Important Ideas to Keep in Mind

In the dynamic landscape of talent acquisition, understanding the nuances of what candidates dislike is paramount for organizations aiming to build a workforce that thrives. The recruitment process is a pivotal juncture where the delicate dance between employers and candidates unfolds, and missteps can lead to lasting repercussions. This article delves into the intricate tapestry of candidate preferences, unveiling ten crucial insights into what candidates often find disheartening or frustrating during their job-seeking journey. By unraveling these aspects, employers can not only refine their recruitment strategies but also foster a more positive candidate experience, ultimately attracting and retaining top-tier talent in a competitive job market.

Unclear Job Descriptions

The foundation of any successful recruitment process lies in the clarity and precision of job descriptions. Job seekers rely on these documents to gauge their suitability for a position, and ambiguous or unclear descriptions can lead to frustration and misunderstandings. In this section, we delve into the repercussions of unclear job descriptions and how employers can mitigate these issues to enhance the overall candidate experience.

The Impact of Unclear Job Descriptions:

1. Confusion and Misalignment:
   Unclear job descriptions often result in confusion for potential candidates. When crucial responsibilities, qualifications, or expectations are not clearly articulated, candidates may struggle to align their skills and experiences with the role, leading to a mismatch between employer expectations and candidate capabilities.
2. Wasted Time and Resources:
   Job seekers invest time and effort in preparing applications and attending interviews. Unclear job descriptions, however, can mislead candidates into applying for positions that are not well-suited to their skills or career goals. This not only wastes the candidate’s time but also consumes valuable resources on the employer’s end.
3. Diminished Employer Brand:
   A lack of clarity in job descriptions can negatively impact an employer’s brand. Candidates may perceive a company with ambiguous job postings as disorganized or lacking a clear vision. A strong employer brand is crucial for attracting top talent, and unclear job descriptions can tarnish that image.
4. Reduced Diversity in Applicant Pool:
   Unclear job descriptions may discourage diverse candidates from applying. When requirements and expectations are not explicitly outlined, individuals from various backgrounds may feel uncertain about their fit within the organization, leading to a less diverse pool of applicants.

Mitigating the Impact:

1. Precision and Clarity:
   Craft job descriptions with precision and clarity. Clearly outline job responsibilities, qualifications, and expectations to provide a comprehensive understanding of the role. Avoid jargon or ambiguous language that may confuse potential candidates.
2. Regularly Update Job Descriptions:
   Job roles evolve over time, and outdated descriptions can contribute to confusion. Regularly review and update job descriptions to ensure they accurately reflect the current needs and expectations of the organization.

Job descriptions serve as the choreographer, guiding employers and candidates towards a harmonious partnership. By recognizing the impact of unclear job descriptions and taking proactive measures to enhance clarity, employers can foster a more positive candidate experience, reduce inefficiencies, and strengthen their employer brand in the competitive job market.

Lengthy and Complicated Application Processes

In the fast-paced world of recruitment, first impressions matter, and the initial interaction between a candidate and a potential employer often occurs through the application process. However, when this process is overly complex and time-consuming, it can act as a significant deterrent, driving away top talent before they even get a chance to showcase their skills. In this section, we’ll explore the challenges of lengthy and complicated application processes and how employers can streamline their procedures for a more positive candidate experience.

The Impact of Lengthy and Complicated Application Processes:

1. Candidate Drop-off Rates:
   Lengthy and intricate application processes contribute to higher candidate drop-off rates. Job seekers, especially those actively exploring multiple opportunities, may abandon an application if it demands an excessive amount of time and effort. This can result in the loss of potential top-tier talent.
2. Negative Candidate Experience:
   A cumbersome application process can create a negative candidate experience. Applicants may associate the difficulty of the application with the overall work environment, leading to a perception of the organization as inefficient or unresponsive.
3. Missed Opportunities for Diverse Candidates:
   Complicated processes may disproportionately affect certain demographic groups. For instance, individuals with diverse backgrounds may face additional challenges or be discouraged from completing lengthy applications, contributing to a lack of diversity in the candidate pool.
4. Delayed Time-to-Hire:
   Complex application procedures can lead to a prolonged time-to-hire. A delayed recruitment process may result in the loss of qualified candidates to competitors who offer a more streamlined and efficient experience.

Mitigating the Impact:

1. Optimize Application Forms:
   Simplify application forms by asking for essential information only. Consider implementing a two-step application process or providing the option to upload resumes initially, saving detailed information for later stages.
2. Mobile-Friendly Applications:
   Optimize the application process for mobile devices to accommodate candidates who prefer or need to apply on the go. A mobile-friendly interface ensures a seamless experience and appeals to a broader range of candidates.
3. Clear Communication of Expectations:
   Clearly communicate the estimated time required to complete the application process. Transparency fosters a positive candidate experience and helps manage expectations, reducing frustration.

The application process sets the rhythm for the candidate’s journey. By acknowledging the impact of lengthy and complicated processes and implementing strategies to streamline applications, employers can not only attract top talent but also cultivate a positive candidate experience that reflects the organization’s efficiency and professionalism. In an era where talent is a prized commodity, optimizing the application process is a strategic imperative for success.

Lack of Communication

Effective communication is the lifeblood of successful recruitment, and the absence of clear and timely communication can have profound consequences on the candidate experience. Job seekers invest time, effort, and emotions in the application process, and when left in the dark, they may feel undervalued or frustrated. In this section, we will explore the detrimental effects of a lack of communication during the recruitment process and suggest strategies for organizations to bridge this communication gap.

The Impact of Lack of Communication:

1. Candidate Frustration and Anxiety:
   When candidates receive little to no communication regarding the status of their application, frustration and anxiety can set in. Uncertainty about whether they are still being considered or if the process is ongoing can lead to a negative perception of the organization.
2. Negative Employer Brand Image:
   A lack of communication can tarnish an employer’s brand. Candidates who feel neglected or unimportant during the recruitment process may share their negative experiences, affecting the organization’s reputation and making it less appealing to potential future candidates.
3. Loss of Top Talent:
   Talented individuals often have multiple job opportunities. A failure to communicate promptly may result in the loss of high-caliber candidates who opt for employers that demonstrate a commitment to keeping them informed and engaged.
4. Decreased Candidate Engagement:
   Candidates who experience poor communication may disengage from the process, leading to a lack of enthusiasm or interest in the organization. This disengagement can affect their performance in subsequent interviews or assessments.

Mitigating the Impact:

1. Establish Clear Communication Protocols:
   Set clear expectations regarding communication from the beginning of the recruitment process. Inform candidates about the expected timeline for updates and provide contact information for inquiries.
2. Automate and Personalize Communication:
   Utilize technology to automate certain communication processes while maintaining a personal touch. Automated updates on application status or next steps can reassure candidates and keep them engaged.
3. Feedback and Constructive Criticism:
   Even in cases of rejection, provide constructive feedback to candidates. This not only demonstrates respect for their efforts but also helps them understand areas for improvement, contributing to a positive overall experience.

Communication serves as the melody that guides candidates through their journey. Acknowledging the impact of a lack of communication and implementing strategies to keep candidates informed are essential steps for organizations seeking to create a positive candidate experience. By prioritizing transparent and timely communication, employers can attract top talent and build a reputation as an organization that values and respects its candidates. In a competitive job market, effective communication can be the key to standing out and securing the best talent for the team.

Impersonal Automated Responses

As technology continues to play an increasingly prominent role in the recruitment process, automated responses have become commonplace. While automation can streamline communication, the risk of impersonality looms large. In this section, we will delve into the challenges posed by impersonal automated responses in recruitment and explore strategies for maintaining a human touch in the digital era.

The Impact of Impersonal Automated Responses:

1. Perceived Lack of Personalization:
   Automated responses, while efficient, may lack the personal touch that candidates seek. A generic acknowledgment of an application or interview can make candidates feel like just another number, diminishing the perceived value of their individual efforts.
2. Negative Candidate Experience:
   An impersonal response can contribute to a negative candidate experience. Job seekers, eager for validation and feedback, may feel overlooked or undervalued when faced with automated, cookie-cutter messages that fail to acknowledge their unique qualities.
3. Diminished Employer Brand:
   Impersonal communication can tarnish an employer’s brand. Candidates who have a subpar experience may share their sentiments online, influencing the perceptions of other potential candidates and damaging the organization’s reputation.
4. Decreased Engagement and Interest:
   Candidates who receive automated, generic responses may disengage from the recruitment process. A lack of personalized communication can lead to decreased interest and enthusiasm, impacting the candidate’s commitment to the potential role.

Mitigating the Impact:

1. Personalize Automated Messages:
   Tailor automated responses to include personal touches, such as addressing candidates by their names and expressing appreciation for their specific skills or experiences. This small effort can go a long way in making candidates feel valued.
2. Strategic Use of Automation:
   While certain aspects of communication can benefit from automation, strategic manual interventions are crucial. Important touchpoints, such as interview invitations or personalized feedback, should involve a more human approach to maintain a sense of connection.
3. Transparent Communication:
   Inform candidates about the use of automated responses and clarify the situations in which they can expect automated messages. Transparency helps manage expectations and allows candidates to understand the balance between efficiency and personalization.

Technology and automation have taken center stage, but maintaining the human touch is the challenge. Recognizing the impact of impersonal automated responses and implementing strategies to infuse a sense of personalization are vital for organizations looking to create a positive candidate experience. By blending efficiency with empathy, employers can navigate the digital divide, attract top talent, and cultivate a reputation as an organization that values the unique contributions of each candidate. Balancing automation with a human touch is the key to successful and meaningful recruitment practices in a digital age.

Unrealistic Job Requirements

Crafting job requirements is a delicate balancing act for employers. While setting high standards is crucial, unrealistic expectations can create barriers, deterring qualified candidates and hindering recruitment. In this section, we will explore the challenges of unrealistic job requirements and how organizations can strike a balance to attract the right talent without setting unattainable benchmarks.

The Impact of Unrealistic Job Requirements:

1. Limited Candidate Pool:
   Setting unrealistic qualifications narrows the candidate pool significantly. Talented individuals who may possess the necessary skills but lack some of the listed requirements may be discouraged from applying, resulting in a missed opportunity for both the employer and the candidate.
2. Increased Time-to-Hire:
   Unrealistic job requirements can extend the time-to-hire as employers struggle to find candidates who meet all criteria. This delay not only hampers productivity but also risks losing qualified individuals to faster-moving competitors.
3. Neglected Transferable Skills:
   Focusing solely on specific qualifications may overlook candidates with valuable transferable skills. Unrealistic requirements may lead employers to dismiss individuals who could quickly adapt and contribute effectively to the role.
4. Negative Employer Brand Image:
   A reputation for setting unrealistic job requirements can tarnish an employer’s brand. Potential candidates may perceive the organization as inflexible or out of touch with market realities, affecting its appeal in the competitive job market.

Mitigating the Impact:

1. Clearly Define Essential vs. Preferred Qualifications:
   Distinguish between essential and preferred qualifications in job listings. Clearly communicate the non-negotiable requirements and highlight others as desirable. This helps potential candidates understand the core requirements for success in the role.
2. Focus on Core Competencies:
   Identify the core competencies required for the role and prioritize those in the job description. Emphasizing the key skills and experiences necessary for success allows for a more inclusive candidate pool.
3. Be Open to Training and Development:
   Express a willingness to invest in training and development for the right candidate. This flexibility can attract motivated individuals who may not meet every requirement but possess a strong foundation and a willingness to learn.

Job requirements set the stage for the potential partnership between employers and candidates. Acknowledging the impact of unrealistic job requirements and adopting a balanced approach is essential for organizations aiming to attract top talent while fostering a positive candidate experience. By aligning expectations with market realities and valuing the potential for growth and development, employers can create a more inclusive recruitment process that benefits both the organization and the candidates seeking to contribute their skills and expertise.

Opaque Company Culture

In the competitive talent acquisition landscape, candidates increasingly prioritize a company’s culture as a critical factor in their decision-making process. However, when organizations fail to provide transparency about their culture, it creates uncertainty for potential hires and can lead to misaligning values. In this section, we’ll explore the challenges posed by opaque company culture in recruitment and discuss strategies for fostering transparency to attract and retain the right talent.

The Impact of Opaque Company Culture:

1. Misaligned Values:
   A lack of clarity about company culture can result in candidates accepting positions in organizations with values misaligned with their own. This misalignment often leads to dissatisfaction, lower engagement, and higher turnover rates.
2. Increased Turnover:
   When candidates are not fully aware of the company’s culture, they may accept a job offer only to realize later that the work environment does not suit their preferences or expectations. This can contribute to higher turnover rates as employees seek a better cultural fit elsewhere.
3. Difficulty Attracting Top Talent:
   Candidates actively seek organizations that align with their values and offer a positive work culture. Opaque company culture can make it challenging for employers to attract top-tier talent, as potential candidates may hesitate to commit without a clear understanding of the workplace environment.
4. Reduced Employee Engagement:
   Employees who are uncertain about the company’s values and cultural aspects may feel disconnected, leading to reduced engagement and productivity. Transparent communication about the organizational culture fosters a sense of belonging and commitment among employees.

Mitigating the Impact:

1. Clearly Articulate Core Values:
   Explicitly communicate the organization’s core values and cultural principles in job listings, on the company website, and during the interview process. This ensures that potential candidates have a clear understanding of what to expect in terms of culture.
2. Showcase Employee Stories:
   Share real-life stories and testimonials from current employees to provide insights into the company’s culture. This humanizes the workplace and gives candidates a firsthand perspective on the experiences of those already working within the organization.
3. Transparent Communication Channels:
   Establish transparent communication channels for candidates to ask questions about the company culture. Encouraging open dialogue demonstrates a commitment to transparency and allows candidates to seek clarification on any aspects of concern.

Company culture serves as the heartbeat, influencing the harmony and success of the partnership between employers and employees. Recognizing the impact of opaque company culture and taking steps to foster transparency is vital for organizations striving to attract and retain top talent. By openly sharing core values, showcasing real employee experiences, and providing avenues for transparent communication, employers can create a positive candidate experience, build a strong employer brand, and cultivate a workplace culture that resonates with the values of their ideal workforce.

Lack of Diversity and Inclusion

Diversity and inclusion have become central tenets in pursuing organizational success in today’s globalized and interconnected world. However, when companies fall short in promoting a diverse and inclusive work environment, it hinders progress and sends a powerful message to potential candidates. In this section, we will explore the challenges posed by the lack of diversity and inclusion in recruitment and discuss strategies for creating a workplace that values and celebrates differences.

The Impact of Lack of Diversity and Inclusion:

1. Limited Perspectives and Creativity:
   A lack of diversity in the workplace restricts the range of perspectives and experiences brought to the table. This limitation can stifle creativity and innovation, hindering the organization’s ability to adapt and thrive in an ever-changing business landscape.
2. Decreased Employee Morale:
   Employees thrive in environments where they feel valued and included. A lack of diversity and inclusion can lead to decreased morale among existing staff, as they may feel their unique contributions are not recognized or appreciated.
3. Difficulty Attracting Diverse Talent:
   Candidates actively seek workplaces that champion diversity and inclusion. A lack of diversity can make it challenging for organizations to attract a broad range of talent, especially from underrepresented groups, as potential hires may be hesitant to join an environment that doesn’t prioritize inclusivity.
4. Negative Employer Brand Image:
   In today’s socially conscious world, companies are increasingly scrutinized for their commitment to diversity and inclusion. A lack of diversity can result in a negative employer brand image, deterring not only potential employees but also customers and clients who value diversity in their business partnerships.

Mitigating the Impact:

1. Implement Inclusive Hiring Practices:
   Review and revise hiring processes to ensure they are inclusive. Consider blind recruitment practices, diverse interview panels, and strategies that mitigate unconscious biases to attract and assess a broader range of candidates.
2. Promote Diversity in Leadership:
   Demonstrate a commitment to diversity at all levels of the organization, including leadership positions. Visible representation in leadership positions sends a powerful message about the company’s dedication to fostering an inclusive workplace.
3. Employee Resource Groups:
   Establish employee resource groups or affinity networks that provide a supportive space for employees with shared characteristics or experiences. These groups can contribute to a sense of belonging and inclusion within the organization.

Diversity and inclusion serve as the heartbeat, pulsating every aspect of the organizational ecosystem. Recognizing the impact of a lack of diversity and inclusion and taking proactive steps to address these issues are imperative for organizations striving to attract and retain top talent. By fostering an environment that embraces differences, values unique perspectives, and actively promotes inclusivity, employers can create a workplace culture that not only attracts diverse talent but also cultivates innovation, creativity, and long-term success.

Unprofessional Interview Processes

The interview process is a pivotal moment in the employer-candidate relationship, and the professionalism exhibited during this phase significantly influences the organization’s perception. When interview processes lack the necessary level of professionalism, they reflect poorly on the employer and raise concerns for potential candidates. This section will delve into the challenges posed by unprofessional interview processes and discuss strategies for organizations to elevate their professionalism to attract and retain top talent.

The Impact of Unprofessional Interview Processes:

1. Negative Candidate Perception:
   An unprofessional interview process can leave a lasting negative impression on candidates. Disorganization, lack of preparation, or disrespectful behavior during interviews may lead potential hires to question the overall professionalism and culture of the organization.
2. Difficulty in Attracting Top Talent:
   Top-tier candidates actively seek employers who demonstrate professionalism throughout the hiring process. An unprofessional interview experience can hinder an organization’s ability to attract the best talent, as candidates may be deterred by the perceived lack of seriousness or commitment.
3. Increased Turnover Rates:
   An unprofessional interview process may lead candidates to accept job offers reluctantly or with reservations. This hesitancy can contribute to higher turnover rates, as individuals may continue their job search in pursuit of a more professionally managed workplace.
4. Damaged Employer Brand:
   Word-of-mouth travels fast, and negative experiences during the interview process can damage an employer’s brand. Candidates who have encountered unprofessionalism may share their experiences on review platforms or social media, impacting the organization’s reputation and hindering future recruitment efforts.

Mitigating the Impact:

1. Thorough Preparation:
   Ensure all interviewers are well-prepared for each candidate interaction. Familiarity with the candidate’s resume, relevant questions, and a clear understanding of the role contribute to a more professional and engaging interview process.
2. Consistent Communication:
   Establish clear and consistent communication channels throughout the interview process. Timely updates, clear expectations, and transparent communication contribute to a smoother and more professional candidate experience.
3. Respect for Candidate’s Time:
   Demonstrate respect for the candidate’s time by adhering to scheduled interview times and providing timely feedback. Delays, last-minute changes, or long waiting periods can convey a lack of regard for the candidate’s time and professionalism.
4. Feedback and Follow-Up:
   Provide constructive feedback to candidates, whether they proceed in the hiring process or not. This demonstrates respect for their efforts and contributes to a positive candidate experience, regardless of the final outcome.

Professionalism is the rhythm that sets the tone for the entire process. Acknowledging the impact of unprofessional interview processes and implementing strategies to enhance professionalism are crucial for organizations seeking to attract and retain top talent. By prioritizing thorough preparation, consistent communication, and respect for the candidate’s time, employers can create a positive and professional interview experience that not only attracts the best talent but also contributes to a strong employer brand and long-term organizational success.

Slow Decision-Making

In the fast-paced world of talent acquisition, the speed at which decisions are made during the hiring process can significantly impact an organization’s ability to secure top talent. When decision-making is sluggish, it not only tests the patience of eager candidates but also jeopardizes the organization’s competitiveness in the job market. In this section, we will explore the challenges posed by slow decision-making in recruitment and discuss strategies for organizations to streamline their processes for a more efficient and attractive candidate experience.

The Impact of Slow Decision-Making:

1. Frustration and Candidate Disengagement:
   A slow decision-making process can frustrate candidates eager to move forward in their careers. Prolonged waiting times for updates or feedback can result in disengagement, as candidates may explore other opportunities with quicker decision timelines.
2. Loss of Top Talent to Competitors:
   Top-tier candidates are often in high demand and may receive multiple job offers. A slow decision-making process increases the risk of losing sought-after talent to competitors who can provide quicker turnaround times and a more decisive hiring experience.
3. Negative Employer Brand Image:
   Candidates may associate slow decision-making with organizational inefficiency or a lack of priority for the hiring process. This negative perception can harm the employer’s brand image, making it less appealing to potential candidates and impacting the organization’s reputation.
4. Extended Time-to-Hire:
   A prolonged decision-making process naturally extends the overall time-to-hire. This delay affects the candidate experience and hampers organizational productivity by leaving key positions unfilled for an extended period.

Mitigating the Impact:

1. Define Clear Decision-Making Protocols:
   Establish clear decision-making protocols within the organization. Clearly outline the steps involved, decision-makers, and expected timelines for each stage of the hiring process to streamline the decision-making journey.
2. Regular Communication and Updates:
   Maintain regular communication with candidates to provide updates on the status of their application. Even if decisions are still pending, transparent communication helps manage expectations and demonstrates the organization’s commitment to keeping candidates informed.
3. Empower Decision-Makers:
   Empower decision-makers with the necessary tools and information to expedite the evaluation process. Ensure that key stakeholders are aware of their roles, responsibilities, and the impact of timely decision-making on the overall recruitment strategy.
4. Utilize Technology for Efficiency:
   Leverage technology to streamline decision-making processes. Applicant tracking systems and collaboration tools can facilitate communication among decision-makers, reducing the time required to reach consensus and make informed hiring decisions.

Time is of the essence, and the speed of decision-making serves as the tempo that determines the rhythm of the hiring process. Acknowledging the impact of slow decision-making and implementing strategies to enhance efficiency is essential for organizations striving to attract and retain top talent. By defining clear protocols, maintaining transparent communication, empowering decision-makers, and leveraging technology, employers can create a streamlined decision-making process that not only attracts the best talent but also contributes to a positive employer brand and sustained organizational success.

Inadequate Compensation Transparency

Salary and compensation are critical considerations for job seekers, influencing their decision to pursue or accept a position within an organization. When employers lack transparency regarding compensation, it creates uncertainty and can lead to misunderstandings that affect the entire recruitment process. In this section, we will explore the challenges posed by inadequate compensation transparency in recruitment and discuss strategies for organizations to foster clearer communication around compensation for a more positive candidate experience.

The Impact of Inadequate Compensation Transparency:

1. Frustration and Disappointment:
   Candidates value transparency regarding salary and benefits. Inadequate compensation transparency can lead to frustration and disappointment, as candidates may invest time and effort in the recruitment process only to find that the offered compensation does not align with their expectations.
2. Wasted Time and Resources:
   Candidates and employers invest resources in the recruitment process. When compensation details are not transparent from the outset, both parties may expend time and effort in pursuing a potential match that ultimately proves incompatible due to misaligned expectations regarding salary and benefits.
3. Difficulty Attracting Top Talent:
   Top-tier candidates often have multiple job opportunities. Lack of transparency regarding compensation may deter qualified individuals from applying or accepting an offer, as they prioritize organizations that are forthright about the remuneration they offer.
4. Negatively Impacted Employer Brand:
   Inadequate compensation transparency can negatively impact an employer’s brand. Candidates who feel they were not given clear information about compensation may share their experiences online, potentially deterring other potential candidates from considering the organization.

Mitigating the Impact:

1. Clearly Communicate Compensation Ranges:
   Provide clear compensation ranges for advertised positions. Communicating the salary or salary range from the beginning sets expectations and attracts candidates who align with the organization’s compensation structure.
2. Discuss Compensation Early in the Process:
   Initiate discussions about compensation early in the recruitment process. This ensures that both the employer and the candidate have a mutual understanding of expectations, reducing the risk of wasted time and resources.
3. Be Transparent about Additional Benefits:
   In addition to salary, be transparent about other benefits such as healthcare, retirement plans, and bonuses. A comprehensive view of the overall compensation package contributes to a positive candidate experience.
4. Utilize Compensation Benchmarking:
   Leverage compensation benchmarking data to ensure the offered salary is competitive within the industry and region. This approach demonstrates a commitment to fair and market-driven compensation practices.

Compensation serves as the heartbeat, influencing the harmony and success of the partnership between employers and employees. Acknowledging the impact of inadequate compensation transparency and implementing strategies to enhance openness is crucial for organizations striving to attract and retain top talent. By providing clear communication on compensation ranges, discussing financial expectations early in the process, and leveraging benchmarking data, employers can create a positive candidate experience that not only attracts the best talent but also contributes to a strong employer brand and sustained organizational success.

Conclusion

Understanding and addressing the dislikes of candidates become integral to building an employer brand that resonates positively in the job market. Navigating the intricacies of job descriptions, application processes, communication protocols, and other key touchpoints requires a strategic approach. Organizations can transform their recruitment processes into a seamless and candidate-centric experience by heeding these ten insights. In doing so, they mitigate the risk of losing top talent and contribute to establishing a positive employer brand that attracts, engages, and retains a diverse and high-caliber workforce. In the dance between employers and candidates, the rhythm of understanding and adapting is the key to a harmonious and successful partnership.

---

This article was created by the FirstHR team. You can find even more helpful HR tips in the Guides section. In the Template section we have prepared for you the most popular HR documents that you can download for free. Enjoy!